Side-by-side matrix of up to 4 real clinical-site records — the six deterministic scoring engines, recruitment & enrollment, clinical-operations, investigator-expertise and audit metrics, plus capability & technology matrices, with the best value in each numeric row highlighted.
Scores deterministic, rules-based — not AI. Institution names are real; recruitment, performance, investigator and budget figures are synthetic demonstration data — not a site-selection determination; verify directly before any decision.
Trial readiness iHeadline score for how broad a range of trials the site can run — from its supported study phases, study types and therapeutic areas.
90
74
66
Recruitment strength iHow reliably the site enrols and keeps participants — from annual patient volume, recruitment success rate, retention rate and referral-network size.
0
0
0
Investigator depth iStrength of the site's investigator bench — from principal- and sub-investigator counts, publications, completed studies and key opinion leaders on staff.
0
0
0
Operational efficiency iHow quickly the site gets trials running — driven mainly by average study-startup days, with credit for fast contract turnaround and query resolution.
0
0
0
Digital maturity iHow far the site has adopted digital-trial technology — from use of eSource, ePRO, eConsent, remote monitoring, telemedicine, wearables and decentralized trials.
100
60
75
Compliance strength iThe site's quality posture — from GCP compliance, CAPA, QMS, data-integrity controls and accreditations.
100
93
93
Capability scores are a directional starting point, not a verdict. A lower score does not disqualify a company or consultant, and no decision should rest on the score alone — always contact the company directly to confirm the specifics for your project.